Knox Warranty on new I9505 ROMs
Posted on 2013-09-12, 145 comments, 187 +1's, imported from Google+/Chainfire

NOTICE: This content was originally posted to Google+, then imported here. Some formatting may be lost, links may be dead, and images may be missing.

As I've stated before, my dev version of Triangle Away is currently operational (though not yet released) for the flash counter and binary status with the new Knox I9505 ROMs.

If you have an I9505 you've probably noticed the new Knox Warranty status in the bootloader, and I know some of you are hoping Triangle Away will reset that.

Unfortunately, that's unlikely. I've taken a look around, I've disassembled the bootloader, etc, and it looks like an efuse might be involved ( == not resetable ). I'm not exactly sure what triggers it yet either.

Mind you, I'm not a bootloader expert nor have I spent hours and hours digging through it, so there's a chance this information might turn out to be wrong later - but that's what it currently looks like to me.

+1187
Brad Baker commented on 2013-09-12 at 20:56:

Fascinating, thanks for the update.

Adam Outler commented on 2013-09-12 at 20:56:

E fuses are really nasty things. They could be used for good.. Like serial numbers and what not... But no, manufacturers are using them for evil and permanently marking a device because you've done something 100% reversible via software update. 

Brad Baker commented on 2013-09-12 at 21:00:

This won't in any way prevent Mobile Odin from being updated to work with the latest firmwares +Chainfire ?

Andrew Dodd commented on 2013-09-12 at 21:05:

+Nicholas Wade One way switch, that's the whole point of them.

Smity Smith commented on 2013-09-12 at 21:19:

I understand the point behind it i think but it/knox should be an opt-in thing for enterprise use surely. also id love to hear of a test-case involving rooting/warranty. In the EU for example, aparently rooting/flashing can only legally void a warranty if it could have caused the fault but the OEMs dont seem to be hearing that..

TheGrooveChannel 2017 commented on 2013-09-12 at 21:29:

This could possibly be thevworst news ive heard all week :-( was really hoping their would be a fix but it cant be helped its just samsubg turning into a bad apoke withbdevs as im sure many will opt for other phones like nexusses ih well sansung have lost my custom thanks +Chainfire your a pro ! Shame about samsung implementing this crap to a consumers device !

TheGrooveChannel 2017 commented on 2013-09-12 at 21:42:

Device status is official s9 does thid allow me to uodate via kies or wifi or will knox be built as my phine is complete stock unrooted but knox shows 0x1 but device is official

Smity Smith commented on 2013-09-12 at 22:32:

would it be possible for sammy to make the efuse a flashable add-on for enterprise and let normal users have a normal phone or is it like hard wired?

Brad Baker commented on 2013-09-12 at 22:42:

I don't see the big deal.. if you want your phone to have the warranty it came with, you can't modify it.. if you want to use it to it's full potential, you void your warranty. This is the same thing that is happening with the Moto X, even though it's bootloader is locked.. and unlocking is provided by Motorola.. you void your warranty.

What I'm saying is.. while this is not ideal.. we're not having something happen to us (our phones) that we didn't expect.

Smity Smith commented on 2013-09-12 at 22:49:

Cheers Andrew. Understood man :-)

Yeah Brad its something that was bound to happen but its still wrong imo... actually the efuse isnt wrong but manufacturers refusing to fix faulty hardware because the firmware is modded is downright wrong.

This is why id love to see a high profile test-case in the courts to clarify things. I get that us modders are a tiny minority though. I worry that all the OEMs could adopt this efuse thing as an excuse to not honour warrantys but disguised as a security must-have

Joe Philipps commented on 2013-09-13 at 00:49:

Understanding the function of "efuses":  Forget the "e" part, just think of it functionally like a fuse.  Once it's blown, it must be physically replaced.  And it's not a socketed part like a normal fuse, it's embedded in a chip soldered to the board.  Since replacing chips is often not feasible, or at least very difficult and/or expensive, for all practical purposes, yes, once blown, it's blown in perpetuity.  The "e" part comes into play in that it's not blown by an abnormal condition causing excessive current, it's done by control circuitry on-purpose...and it's "e" because of the fact that its status (still present or blown) can be probed/read by the processor.

It could also be thought of like a PROM  (mind you, not like the more common types of an EPROM or an EEPROM, but the original PROMs which were in essence an array of fuses) with an integrated "programmer."

Smity Smith commented on 2013-09-13 at 01:08:

Man thats a horrible thing lol. But i suppose the fact that its triggered by software means that could potentially be blocked by software? (Although i suppose samsung have made that very hard hence the name knox?)

Joe Philipps commented on 2013-09-13 at 01:10:

It's all a matter of software, some of which the user can modify (what's in flash), some of which can't (the power-on reset code which is executed...at least I think you can't alter it once the manufacturer programs it).  If that POR code will run any ole bootloader, that bootloader doesn't have to look at the efuse.  If on the other hand you can somehow flash a bootloader with a proper signature into the device, you either have to figure out how to sign your bootloader somehow (which yours doesn't look at the efuse) and it passes signature verification (nearly impossible, unless you can find a weakness in the sig algo, brute force the key, get a leaked key, etc.), or you're also out of luck because the POR code looks at the efuse directly.

Smity Smith commented on 2013-09-13 at 01:57:

Thanks for explaining things to me guys. I appreciate it

Marek Puszko commented on 2013-09-13 at 05:40:

Damn :/ If i want locked device I would buy HTC or Sony. It's realy unfair, especially Samsung didn't warn users about it. Now I have locked device without root, which is pretty useless for power user.

Alexandru Zamfir commented on 2013-09-13 at 05:51:

+Marek Puszko you can still root and use your device. The only thing is you must live with the Knox Warranty Void Flag on (0x1)

Alexandru Zamfir commented on 2013-09-13 at 05:55:

+Chainfire are you planning to release the new triangleaway even without the Knox Warranty Void clear capability? We are looking forward to it. Anyway we don't even know the implications of this new flag. Maybe it affects users just in a Knox BYOD environment so who cares. 

Marek Puszko commented on 2013-09-13 at 06:09:

I know. But if I want to be sure about the warranty, there shouldn't be any footprint of digging in device. If I root phone - there will be one.

Sony is good example here (at least older devices like Neo V): you can root device and unrooot it without problem. Unlocking bootloader (irreversible) is neccesary only if you want to use CM etc. And you know it BEFORE purchase. 

Michael Lux commented on 2013-09-13 at 06:43:

The only thing I don't unterstand in this place is: The phone is out for several months and they enable the fuse NOW? When it was already there, as I unterstand it according to that post, why was this crap not enabled in the first place? Really weird... start to hate that stupid pseudo-security programs :(

Kevin Rombold commented on 2013-09-13 at 07:45:

Bad news for all who had already rerooted the s4 ...

Now i'm sitting on an unrooted again s4 with knox warranty void 0x1   ...

Older Firmwares flashing is not possible anymore

And i'm thinking about, if it's possible, to flash Google Edition Firmware...

Michael Lux commented on 2013-09-13 at 08:43:

Same thing for me, but I'm thinking about CyanogenMod... xD

Arthur Radulescu commented on 2013-09-13 at 08:57:

+Chainfire did you find someone to help you working on this?

Nuno Ribeiro commented on 2013-09-13 at 09:05:

Thank you for your efforts.

Marco Nunes commented on 2013-09-13 at 11:58:

+Chainfire if you reflash a stock rom (like MH8), doesn't it remove the root and reset the counters to zero after a full wipe?

Thanks

Michael Lux commented on 2013-09-13 at 12:49:

+Marco Nunes Yes, it does remove root. No, it'll neither reset the flash counter, nor the knox void flag. And a full wipe doesn't affect the bootloader at all.

AND as discussed above, once you've flashed this %&$§?! knox booloader, you can't even flash a non-knox image at all...

Daniela Okafor commented on 2013-09-13 at 13:56:

I use custom rom based on mh8 with bootloader removed.. And reset flash counter to zero.. :/

Herminia Ordax commented on 2013-09-13 at 14:48:

+Daniela okafor which ROM?

Aitor González commented on 2013-09-13 at 14:51:

error!

jimmy karelos commented on 2013-09-13 at 14:51:

how we can remove this bootloader and flash another one?

Aitor González commented on 2013-09-13 at 15:34:

+Daniela Okafor Which ROM you installed ?

Ken Wong commented on 2013-09-13 at 16:14:

which rom has this knox thing inside ? 

Roberto Sartori commented on 2013-09-13 at 16:17:

So, the only solution, is to flash the new Rom without the bootloader (modded Rom), if we haven't update yet...right?

Jan Kopanski commented on 2013-09-13 at 19:11:

If I were you I would skip the update. Most unstable piece of software that claims to be stable ever.

Jan Kopanski commented on 2013-09-13 at 19:14:

+Roberto Sartori not really. getting the privileges to flash involves unlocking the bootloader hence void warranty.

Roberto Sartori commented on 2013-09-13 at 19:15:

+Jan Kopanski but if I came from an older Rom I don't touch the bootloader :)

Jan Kopanski commented on 2013-09-13 at 19:30:

+Roberto Sartori I know what you mean but since you're not able to downgrade from what I've heard it might be hard. Also that would probably pickup on it or it would just pure not work as Linux permissions were changed.

Roberto Sartori commented on 2013-09-13 at 20:01:

+Jan Kopanski Yeah but I haven't update, so I've now the old bootloader :)

Jan Kopanski commented on 2013-09-13 at 23:25:

I wouldn't update (unless you have LTE in your area). It's very buggy and well waiting out will see what can be done.

Jean-Yves PETIT commented on 2013-09-14 at 01:41:

I updated triangle away to 3.05 version for my i9505 xef. After nearly charged all, the phone won't stop to reboot. Maybe another program didn't like this update? or the system workaround which blocking the root access?

Daniela Okafor commented on 2013-09-14 at 15:24:

+Herminia Ordax +Aitor González Echoe Rom for now until omega rom update to latest firmware... :)

Lionel Almiñana commented on 2013-09-14 at 16:55:

Knox blocks dslr controller, any idea?

Jean-Yves PETIT commented on 2013-09-15 at 00:05:

Ok i had to remove my sd card to not have the loop reboot.

A problem of this triangle away update with sd card system?

Alexandre Marocco commented on 2013-09-15 at 02:50:

Keep up the good work +Chainfire, I'm sure you master devs guys will come up with something to save us all. Thanks for all the hard work.

Rowen Nortje commented on 2013-09-15 at 03:41:

+Chainfire E-Fuses on the i9505 damn that sucks... :( However I reckon they will have done the same thing to the i9500 because it is a really convenient way of ensuring ones warranty status.

Jeffery Butler commented on 2013-09-16 at 18:32:

FYI...Samsung told me that Knox warranty becomes 0x1(void) when the device with secured bootloader attempts to have non-secured bootloader.  MH1 is the very first binary with secured bootloader.  If MH1 is attempted to be downgraded to lower version(i.e. MGD) which has non-secured bootloader, then Knox warranty becomes void forever, and this means that the device can be used only for non-Knox device(no container can be created).

Kevin Rombold commented on 2013-09-16 at 20:08:

means that warranty is void for the whole device ...

It says ...bad user- you have opened the bootloader so look what to do if a hardware error not caused by rooting occures...

And another point samsung lost fans with ^^

And Downgrade from MH5 to MGA for example is NOT possible...

Ducu Alx commented on 2013-09-17 at 09:36:

+Jeffery Butler +Chainfire 

Has anyone here received  "knox warranty void" after updating by OTA or Kies and having a rooted device before MHx ( only stock fw + root e.g.) ?

Kevin Rombold commented on 2013-09-17 at 13:32:

the new bootloader causes odin to fail when u try to flash an older firmware

I've tried it a bunch of times.

Had to make an "Disaster Recovery" (google translation xDD)  with kies to make my phone stop bootlooping (recovery mode was not able to start)

Maybe there are some ways with custom recovery but i read in some forums that the knox counter still keeps 0x1 after reflashing older Firmware because the bootloader ws not donwgraded ^^

And befor rerooting after update i had knox warranty void with 0x0

after rerooting 0x1 ^^

Jeffery Butler commented on 2013-09-17 at 15:41:

+Andre Ponert The information I provided was taken directly from a contact at Samsung.  I'm currently testing KNOX functionality for another company and ended up running into this issue during some routine remediation testing.  I now have a i9505 that is useless to test KNOX with.

The process I followed was this...

1) Start with MH1

2) Use CF-Auto-Root tool to root device

3) Use Odin to re-flash MH1

Samsung has said that they have had a handful of reports (4 or 5 total) that re-flashing MH1on a device with MH1 switched KNOX Warranty Void flag to 0x1 and advised us against doing this.

The only information I was given was what I posted.  I don't feel comfortable answering your question since Samsung stated to me that the KNOX Warranty Void flag can not be changed back once changed.

Edgardo Rodriguez commented on 2013-09-17 at 23:55:

Hi! I own a Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-i9500 which i already rooted so my warranty has been void. May I help you?

Arthur Radulescu commented on 2013-09-18 at 14:48:

+Ducu Alx I have a I9505 and had a rooted MEA version on it (rooted with CF-Auto-Root). I've upgraded to MH8 directly through Odin, my KNOX warraty is still ON (0x0). I haven't rooted MH8 because I've read +Chainfire post BEFORE. This is how it looks now: http://screencast.com/t/HEc7taZv

I hope this info helps you.

Tim Loots commented on 2013-09-20 at 20:42:

Supposedly, the only thing that's supposed to set the Knox warranty void-flag to 1 is flashing the bootloader. Perhaps I'm a noob since I need to ask this: Would CF Auto Root overwrite the bootloader and thus trigger this flag? Or would it flash some other part of the system and leave the warranty void flag alone, thus achieving root without having to worry about knox?

Arthur Radulescu commented on 2013-09-20 at 21:39:

+Tim Loots as far as I understand this process, it has to alter the boot loader to boot one-time-only into an "inert" state to be able to alter the files needed for root, which otherwise are protected. If it doesn't boot into this special state, it won't be able to alter those files as they are protected. Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Tim Loots commented on 2013-09-20 at 21:57:

That makes sense, too bad though. I hope we get a clearer picture of exactly what the consequences of this change are. I'd really like to root my phone and have it run CM, but right now I'm not so sure I'm not going to run into all sorts of problems. All things considered, the warranty void-flag doesn't even bother me that much.

Phillip Maiden commented on 2013-09-22 at 13:10:

+Tim Loots same here, just want to know if I can put the Google Edition on my phone without any problems.

Inna Geller commented on 2013-09-23 at 14:17:

I

Edgardo Rodriguez commented on 2013-09-24 at 11:22:

Nope, where can web get it?

Kenneth Qvarfordt commented on 2013-09-24 at 21:43:

Quite upset over this. I was going to buy the note3 but that ain't gonna happen now. New note3 owners won't have the luxury of skipping the new bootloader.

So I guess I'll just have to wait for the nexus 5 instead. Could do worse I suppose.

Edgardo Rodriguez commented on 2013-09-24 at 21:50:

Sorry for my supid question... What does it mean a permissive bootloader? How can web check actual status? Thanks.

Edgardo Rodriguez commented on 2013-09-24 at 21:50:

Sorry for my supid question... What does it mean a permissive bootloader? How can web check actual status? Thanks.

Tim Loots commented on 2013-09-24 at 22:50:

Quite sure he meant his SELinux status, that's not the bootloader per se. What is it you want to check anyway? No offense, but do you have any clue what this is about?

Ahad Abedin commented on 2013-09-25 at 04:24:

My freedom is not working saying that it needs updated market what the heck?

Simon Anderson commented on 2013-09-25 at 08:12:

My wife is using an O2 branded device and it has no KNOX popups while rooted, nor does it have the KNOX counter. I have the 'Unbranded' version (GT-I9505) and have both the counter and the popups. the only reason i rooted was to use the PS3 gamepad with Modern Combat 4 (Multiplayer online using 4G). I wish i had of bought the N4, and i will never purchase a Samsung handset again.

Lars Rossetnes commented on 2013-09-25 at 20:38:

is it not possible to remove the knox features from the bootloader before you update? If you haven't updatet yet i mean.

Tim Loots commented on 2013-09-25 at 21:30:

Removing the whole bootloader should work. But why would you want that?

Dimitar Petkov commented on 2013-09-26 at 08:32:

To prevent update maybe ;)

Dimitar Petkov commented on 2013-09-26 at 08:35:

First i9505 have a worse camera... bow and that KNOX ** I wont to by another phone and never by SAMSUNG again!

Dimitar Petkov commented on 2013-09-26 at 08:38:

First i9505 have a worse camera... bow and that KNOX ** I wont to by another phone and never by SAMSUNG again!

Dimitar Petkov commented on 2013-09-26 at 15:22:

First i9505 have a worse camera... bow and that KNOX ** I wont to by another phone and never by SAMSUNG again!

Kim Ladefoged commented on 2013-09-26 at 19:04:

Fuu, i ordered note 3 today, but i didnt read about Knox :(. I sure hope you or someone else can get us a "fix" for this :)

Jon Tan commented on 2013-09-27 at 06:18:

FFUUUU , I updated in kies to knox firmware without knowing have such thing :(((

Marek Puszko commented on 2013-09-27 at 10:29:

Just like me (and many others). That's why I'm so upset :|

Jon Tan commented on 2013-09-27 at 15:16:

whatever shit can be cracked

Jon Tan commented on 2013-09-27 at 15:28:

+passaris konstantinos lol , for now don't do anything stupid to void the warranty.

TeRry P. commented on 2013-09-29 at 07:58:

damn, better stay with N900 then, N9005 is a no go for now unless you don't care about warranty

Io kap commented on 2013-09-29 at 20:37:

punish samsung i will stop buy and i will sell my s4

Tony Tien commented on 2013-09-30 at 03:26:

Good thing most third-party warranty services won't care. What annoys me is Samsung's decision to throw Knox in with consumer end-user firmware, I think this should only be enabled on enterprise and business phones, maybe BYOD for business. Maybe.

Vuk Vukovic commented on 2013-10-01 at 13:24:

Any new information about resetting Knox?

Chainfire commented on 2013-10-01 at 14:27:

There really isn't any news. I've asked around, but no answers yet. I'll be getting a Note 3 later today or tomorrow (not sure which exact model, whichever model is normal over here), and I'll CF-Auto-Root it, and see what it does to the KNOX flag (assuming it's present - I don't personally care about the warranty anyway). I have the KNOX flag on my S4 set to 1, but I did a lot of mucking about and did try to flash an older bootloader, so ...

Vuk Vukovic commented on 2013-10-01 at 14:58:

I have untouched S4 with stock Samsung Touchwiz and I want to flash CWM and Google Edition S4 android (from i9505G). Will it set KNOX flag to 1?

Vuk Vukovic commented on 2013-10-01 at 19:28:

You have everything on XDA developers :)

Vuk Vukovic commented on 2013-10-01 at 20:10:

I gave you 2 links.

Chainfire commented on 2013-10-01 at 21:02:

Just to follow up on my earlier message, simply flashing a custom recovery on the Note3 sets the knox warranty void to 0x1

Vuk Vukovic commented on 2013-10-01 at 21:05:

Just to check, I will get KNOX after latest android upadte? What if I don't have that update yet, install custom rom and sometime when I need warranty flash stock rom and reset everything. Is that possible? How can I check if I have KNOX?

Giovanni John Genova commented on 2013-10-02 at 06:08:

What I would like to understand is if having a GN2 like myself and updating when available Android 4.3 will I be having the same problems like knox and sim locking as the GN3? 

Kevin Rombold commented on 2013-10-02 at 08:52:

The 4.3 for GN2 will also have the new bootloader, SELinux with no longer : permissive.

Maybe there would be the Update in the Download Modus with the new knox waranty void Flag because i dont think samsung will remove that only for some older models

Giovanni John Genova commented on 2013-10-02 at 08:58:

Thanks for the info Kevin, as I thought. I will definitely remain on 4.1.2. To think I will have to look for an alternative of the GN3 doesn't make me happy, but I will if this continues to be Samsung's policy

Matthew LeGrand commented on 2013-10-02 at 21:11:

It appears the simply rooting or trying to flash the stock firmware (repakced) will do this too.

More here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2447832

Time to break out your UART +Adam Outler and enlist Ralekdev  to help while you are at it.  This could be a tough cookie to break.

Mark Anthony Braganza commented on 2013-10-03 at 01:34:

Any development guys? still 0x1. :(

Antonio Minerva commented on 2013-10-04 at 09:05:

Ci sono novità? Su knox 0x1 galaxy s4 gt-i9505?

Grazie e Saluti

Rico Gere commented on 2013-10-05 at 11:36:

Simple question:

What happens If I'm on the old bootloader and flash new MH8 for example through Mobile Odin? (Mobile Odin doesn't flash bootloader). Chainfire or anyone can answer this? I know it's not to do it so far.

Sotos P commented on 2013-10-05 at 19:38:

If I unroot and use odin to restore to a stock firmware the knox warranty will be still void.

Ps: I just rooted my device I have never flashed a custom rom

Sonny Gilbert commented on 2013-10-06 at 06:33:

+Dom Eyre Camera ... better? wtf the One has a rubbish camera

Mark Anthony Braganza commented on 2013-10-07 at 03:15:

+Nayer Nosseir : you mean, knox-based 4.2.2?

Mark Anthony Braganza commented on 2013-10-07 at 12:09:

I see. Knox-based fw. that's why you could downgrade. but non knox-based fw is impossible. +Nayer Nosseir 

Stan S. commented on 2013-10-07 at 21:58:

oh please... i hope it is not triggered by an efuse... there must be a way to reset it. 

Antonio Valladares commented on 2013-10-09 at 06:39:

Hi i ran triangle away 3.10 and i still get the custom status on system settings, any suggestions? It would be greatly appreciated

Andrei Tabacu commented on 2013-10-09 at 21:07:

+Antonio Valladares hi, did you try to flash a stock rom like i9505xxuemi8 ? It works for me but I still have knox status 0x1. 

Andrea Bombarda commented on 2013-10-09 at 22:01:

Good!

Andrew Williams commented on 2013-10-09 at 23:05:

Hi Chainfire, I just wanted to confirm that the new CF-Auto-Root for GT-I9505 is able to be flashed without bricking the device (currently on stock H8 ROM with locked boot loader)?  Because your CF-Auto-Root Repository mentions unlocking the boot loader?  But there is no script listed for the GT-I9505? Thanks in advance!

Jose Carlos Ferraz Varona commented on 2013-10-11 at 11:34:

+Steve Weaver Not true. Last week my I9505 was unable to connect to my mobile network and after trying all (factory reset, installing another rom, etc) I ended sending it to the repair service. Of course I unrooted it and launched triangle away. Bottom line sometimes you need warranty.

Lyall Johnson commented on 2013-10-15 at 03:32:

+Daniela Okafor but is your knox warranty back to 0x0??

Jose Carlos Ferraz Varona commented on 2013-10-15 at 05:53:

+passaris konstantinos Thanks for your help. I know about efs and it seems that the folder was ok. I had my IMEI and things like bluetooth or wifi were working fine. Anyway my phone is now under repair and I hope to have it back soon but I'm afraid that with knox installed.

Daniela Okafor commented on 2013-10-15 at 16:50:

+Lyall Johnson in download mode, i do not see any sort of knox warranty status. I don't think my ROM is knox-enabled yet. 

Andrei Tabacu commented on 2013-10-15 at 17:03:

Hi everyone. Do you know if old Galaxy (S2 & S3) have Knox efuse inside? If yes is interesting to know why Samsung never talk about it?

Boris Köster commented on 2013-10-23 at 11:24:

I think that the KNOX technology may protect business data, but it does not prevent other systems to spy the phone. If there is any problem in the existing code, I remember the DEX problems with the play store (apps could get root or more permissions as allowed). I think, if I look at the public KNOX architecture, that this system still allows internal attacks against the phone itself and the funny thing is, if these rumors about the efuse chip are true, destroy the device after the attack. Funny funny.  They are beginning to kick us all out of their (spy?) system. I like the S4, but there should be an option to refuse knox for people who do not want this. Did you all notice that we users get all kicked out of our operating systems, it began with vista on pc and now knox on android. We are loosing the control about our own machines we bought. We have less rights about these things than we should have. Sorry 4 my engl

Boris Köster commented on 2013-10-23 at 11:26:

Finally signed loaders or so with CAs.. a final word about these.. there are a lot of examples for manipulated or stolen CAs that gave out faked valid certificates... an attacker with a valid CA may be able to upload something that no one wants... now the question may be... who could do that... we all know...

Nicolas De Leon commented on 2013-10-26 at 23:49:

Please find a solution to the I9505 Knox, appears to me (0x1)  , i need 0x0 .  Thanks

Roeland Jansen commented on 2013-10-29 at 15:52:

we should in fact have the option for refusing knox and selinux I'd say.

HTC is no option here for a similar phone for me. I want to have a removable battery and removable extra storage.

I disabled knox with pm disable com.sec.knox.seandroid

but every datarestore f*cked up the selinux context that had to fix every time. So left stock touchwiz in favor of cm 10.2.

Janis Froehlig commented on 2013-10-29 at 22:55:

So GMD Stylus Control is SOL right along with me. Lovely.

As a mom, I say fuck 'em. I can be responsible for my own phone, and I can pay $10/mo for insurance so I can toast my phone (under a car tire works well). I need both root and a stylus, and that's what they led me to believe I was buying. If something I know should be warrantied goes bad, like Sammy USB ports do, then am I wrong for finding a way to hold them culpable for it?

Anthony Martino commented on 2013-10-30 at 23:06:

+Chainfire  Have you noticed this thread on xda?looks like something you can do ... only you can solve

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2504258

Daniela Okafor commented on 2013-10-31 at 10:46:

This doesn't stop me from flashing custom roms because i never cared about warranty..

Md Moinul Islam commented on 2013-10-31 at 19:59:

okey. I got it. eFuse can be irreversible and an one way switch. but what about the software that checks for Knox's 0x0 and 0x1? That is crackable. some of us just have to find the right part of the software parameter that returns the value of Knox.

Md Moinul Islam commented on 2013-10-31 at 19:59:

okey. I got it. eFuse can be irreversible and an one way switch. but what about the software that checks for Knox's 0x0 and 0x1? That is crackable. some of us just have to find the right part of the software parameter that returns the value of Knox.

Pål Sneve Prestbakk commented on 2013-10-31 at 20:57:

aah...crap... i just spent hours trying to get CM on my i9505 here in norway. Now i get by this thread, and yes i am 0x1... hoping for +Chainfire fo figure this out, will atleast donate 2x favorite beverages. Been using all the galaxys, from 1 to 4, but now it seems i gotta go with something without fort knox. dammit!

Ultra NEO commented on 2013-11-02 at 02:43:

+Chainfire. Dude. Forget about the eFuse for a moment... Do you think that some time in the future people like me who accidentally upgraded to 4.3 can find a way to downgrade? Since recovering my phone from a failed flash Kies nicely decided to flash it's latest firmware into the phone. This really does piss me off

Patrik Borženský commented on 2013-11-09 at 19:41:

My phone is flag 0x1 . Do you think that in the future it will go fix? :/

Ultra NEO commented on 2013-11-09 at 20:58:

Personally I don't care about the flagged status.. i wonder will Samsung's approach make people rethink their future purchases? I know I won't be buying another phone from Samsung.

Roeland Jansen commented on 2013-11-09 at 21:13:

I don't care either. However, for me a few things are mandatory, removable battery as well as micro sd card support. that rules out a few models and makes. Both knox and selinux may go for me.

Mohammad Irfan Safdar Ali commented on 2013-11-20 at 06:47:

Hi all,

Below is a good news shared by someone:

Today I went to Samsung service center to fix my note 3 SM-N9005 after I missed up with it.. no efs folder, no IMEI, bootloader flashed to MJ3 and the Konx was 0x1 actually warranty void..

The technician guy checked the Konx and told me the warranty is void but don't worry I will fix it for free.

The surprised thing is that they have fixed my mobile within 10 minutes.

After fixing it.. I checked the the Konx is back to 0x0 so they reset it !.

The bootloader back to MJ1 so they downgraded the bootloader !!.

IMEI and serial no. never changed !!.

And no hardware change at all.. so now, its very clear the Konx trigger is a software trigger and can be reset again with some how.

Steven Cross commented on 2013-11-20 at 15:39:

+Mohammad Irfan Safdar Ali Thanks for the news, lets hope its inspiring to some of the experts reading it!

Roeland Jansen commented on 2013-11-21 at 00:06:

+Nirav Parekh maybe the same way as with SIM cards. Blow a fuse, by entering wrong pincodes. And then be able to "reset" via PUK code until all fuses are blown.  (obviously to a maximum?)

Roeland Jansen commented on 2013-11-21 at 14:15:

+Nirav Parekh not sure but since the platforms are almost the same....

stuart frew commented on 2013-11-23 at 20:03:

I will also confirm that this is def a software thing and not hardware this comes from samsung them selfs who have stated they can reset it but only at their service centre as I will not have the said software at home but they can fix it only took 3 weeks to obtain this information from them

Mohammad Irfan Safdar Ali commented on 2013-11-24 at 04:09:

Thanks for info....

ashik kadumeni commented on 2013-12-04 at 09:37:

any one have any idea about downgrade i9505 4.3 to 4.22?

tnx in advance

Keith Gordon commented on 2013-12-07 at 06:44:

I haven't been able to downgrade the s4, but I did downgrade my note2 after the 4.3 update with the back to stock mc2, I swear this should work with the s4 somehow. I'm getting ready to sell my s4 on Craig's list, it just doesn't seem like there is any progress in breaking Knox, and it is really bogging down the system. I've benchmarked both the note2 and the s4 and the difference is the s4 takes twice as long to execute the test with a Knox bootloader

Muhammad Hafizuddin commented on 2013-12-08 at 03:52:

+Chainfire how can i restore binary on i9500? Not working with my i9500

Daniel Guerrero commented on 2013-12-20 at 23:56:

if i accepted the 4.3 ota on galaxy s3 and then rooted to set knox warranty void to 1 can i unroot it to accept the next update?

Richard Brown commented on 2013-12-22 at 01:52:

one guy says that he carried in his phone to samsung agent and they did reset it. Most likely it can be reset but it would take a lot of work.

José A. Santiago Méndez commented on 2013-12-22 at 18:11:

Sorry for my english, I try all I can and I find that the problem with knox is aboot.mbn, im not a boot programmer but i know computer science and  I verify this file called aboot.mbn and have the Knox to enable,  if any programer can try to make a aboot.mbn that cancel or desable Knox youve won the game and posible reset counter and downgrade.

José A. Santiago Méndez commented on 2013-12-22 at 18:13:

Please for Samsung Galaxy S3 SGH-I747M.

Richard Brown commented on 2013-12-22 at 23:34:

well that is what the guy said. the samsung agents reset it for him. it can be reset. they have the software to do it. i wonder if one of the would leak that software?

Richard Brown commented on 2014-01-16 at 09:41:

I see..... Then we just have to wait for the leaked software.

Rossella De Chirico commented on 2014-02-11 at 21:37:

Now?

Aswin Aravind commented on 2014-03-11 at 09:25:

Is it possible to create a fake bootloader image so that knox status can be hidden?

Richard Brown commented on 2014-03-11 at 12:05:

Hmmmm....have to wait for the software leak.

Aswin Aravind commented on 2014-03-12 at 14:53:

One doubt.on my N7100 the knox status shows "1" only it is not "0x1". is this a glitch?

Richard Brown commented on 2014-03-12 at 15:25:

Well that's the one we're talking bout.

Richard Brown commented on 2014-03-12 at 15:25:

It need to be set to zero

Mattias Magnusson commented on 2014-04-09 at 20:41:

hopefully not an efuse, i badly wish it's not an efuse xD maybe it's possible to just lock the efuse? or bypass it in some deep system edits xD (hopefully)

Aswin Aravind commented on 2014-06-02 at 16:23:

+Richard Brown no what I'm saying is that knox status is just 1 and note 0×1

Richard Brown commented on 2014-06-02 at 17:03:

I heard that you have to pay 65.00 euros to reset it

judas janus commented on 2014-06-11 at 23:18:

looks like a hacker competition what samsung started there...and looks like they loose alot of customers right now. can we not just take samsung to court to steal our time like that?

Nic Jackson commented on 2014-11-11 at 21:51:

Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 (SM-T330) Android version 4.4.2 KNOX Warranty Void 0x1 after owning the device for less then 2 weeks, when it was still under warranty for another 14 months. Followed a thread on XDA to achieve this. Why do people not remove dead threads that no longer work?

This post is over a month old, commenting has been disabled.